Your AI Needs Context Management (And You Do Too)
The Problem Nobody’s Talking About
You’re 3 hours into a new AI assistant session. You’ve already explained:
- Your microservices architecture (again)
- Which services use which databases (for the 10th time this week)
- The deployment process (because it forgot)
- What you’re actually trying to build (starting from scratch)
Sound familiar?
Every. Single. Session.
With every AI tool (Warp, Cursor, ChatGPT, Claude), you’re playing the same game:
“Let me copy-paste this architecture doc… wait, where did I put it? Oh right, it’s in Notion. No wait, we updated it in Slack. Actually, is this version outdated?”
Meanwhile, your teammate is explaining a completely different architecture to their AI assistant.
The Hidden Cost
Let’s do the math:
- 10 minutes setting up context per session
- 5 AI sessions per day (switching tools, new features, debugging)
- 50 minutes/day just explaining your own project
- ~4 hours/week
- ~200 hours/year per developer
For a 10-person team, that’s 2,000 hours/year = $200,000 in wasted time (at $100/hour).
And that’s before counting:
- Inconsistent answers (each dev has different context)
- Onboarding nightmare (2 weeks for new devs to grok the system)
- Context drift (your AI doesn’t know about last month’s refactor)
- Tool switching penalty (different context in Warp vs Cursor vs Claude)
The Solution: Treat Context Like Code
Here’s a radical idea: What if project context was version-controlled, team-shared, and tool-agnostic?
Just like you wouldn’t copy-paste code between developers, why copy-paste context between AI sessions?
Introducing Universal Context Management
# One time setup
cd ~/your-project
gptcode context init
# Edit context (like editing code)
vi .gptcode/context/shared.md
# Sync to ALL your AI tools
gptcode context sync
# ✅ Warp
# ✅ Cursor
# ✅ Clipboard (for ChatGPT/Claude web)
That’s it. Single source of truth. Version-controlled. Team-shared.
What You Get
1. Zero-effort context loading
# Every Warp session
gptcode context sync # ← 1 second
# vs
# 10 minutes of copy-pasting and explaining
2. Team consistency
# Developer A updates architecture
echo "## Redis Layer\nCaching strategy..." >> .gptcode/context/shared.md
git commit -am "Add Redis context"
git push
# Developer B gets it automatically
git pull
gptcode context sync
# ✅ Their AI now knows about Redis too
3. Tool agnosticism
Same context works in:
- ✅ Warp Terminal
- ✅ Cursor IDE
- ✅ ChatGPT web (via clipboard)
- ✅ Claude web (via clipboard)
- ✅ Any AI assistant (via clipboard)
4. Context evolution
git log .gptcode/context/shared.md
commit abc123 - "Add Redis caching layer"
commit def456 - "Migrate to microservices"
commit ghi789 - "Initial monolith architecture"
Your AI’s knowledge evolves with your codebase. Because it’s in your codebase.
Real-World Example
Before: Chaos
Monday morning, Developer A:
AI: What's your architecture?
Dev: We have a monolith with PostgreSQL...
[10 minutes of explanation]
Monday afternoon, Developer B:
AI: What's your architecture?
Dev: We're migrating to microservices...
[15 minutes of different explanation]
Tuesday, new feature:
AI: What's your architecture?
Dev: Ugh, let me start over...
After: One Source of Truth
.gptcode/context/shared.md (committed to git):
# Architecture
Currently transitioning from monolith to microservices:
- **Monolith** (legacy): Rails app, PostgreSQL
- **Services** (new):
- API Gateway (Kong)
- User Service (Elixir)
- Payment Service (Node.js)
## Communication
- Services use Redis pub/sub
- Monolith gradually being decomposed
## What to work on
See .gptcode/context/next.md
Every developer, every session:
gptcode context sync # ← Done
AI knows:
- Current architecture (monolith + microservices)
- Communication patterns (Redis pub/sub)
- Where to find next tasks
Consistent. Always up-to-date. Zero effort.
The Three Context Files
shared.md - The Technical Foundation
Stable, changes slowly (monthly):
- Architecture
- Tech stack
- Patterns & conventions
- Development setup
next.md - Current Priorities
Changes frequently (weekly):
- What we’re building now
- This sprint’s focus
- Immediate blockers
roadmap.md - The Vision
Changes occasionally (quarterly):
- Q1/Q2/Q3 goals
- Future direction
- Long-term plans
Why separate?
- AI doesn’t need your Q3 roadmap when fixing a bug
- “What’s next?” and “How does this work?” are different questions
- Smaller context = faster AI responses, lower costs
How It Works
1. Single Source of Truth
.gptcode/context/ ← Edit here (ONE place)
shared.md
next.md
roadmap.md
2. Auto-Sync to Integrations
gptcode context sync
# Writes:
WARP.md ← Warp reads this
.cursor/docs/ ← Cursor reads this
3. Version-Controlled Evolution
git log .gptcode/
commit def456 - "Update: Redis caching added"
commit abc123 - "Update: migrated to microservices"
4. Team Shares via Git
git pull # Get team's context updates
gptcode context sync # Update local tools
Use Cases
Large Monorepos
20+ microservices, different patterns per service.
.gptcode/context/shared.md:
## Services
- user-service: Elixir/Phoenix, port 4000
- payment-service: Node.js, port 3000
- notification-service: Go, port 8080
[... 17 more services]
gptcode context sync # AI knows ALL services
Every session starts with full context. No more “wait, which port does user-service run on?”
Team Onboarding
New developer, day 1:
git clone repo
cd repo
gptcode context show # ← Full architecture overview in 30 seconds
gptcode context sync # ← All AI tools have context
# Start coding immediately
No more 2-week ramp-up. Context is in the repo.
Multi-Tool Workflows
Terminal (Warp) + IDE (Cursor) + Design (Claude web):
# Once
gptcode context sync # Warp + Cursor
# Per session
gptcode context export clipboard # Claude web
Same context, every tool. Zero copy-paste.
Context Drift Prevention
Architecture changed 3 months ago. Your AI still thinks it’s a monolith.
Solution:
# When you refactor
vi .gptcode/context/shared.md # Update architecture
git commit -am "Update: split into microservices"
# Everyone gets it
git pull
gptcode context sync
Context stays synchronized with reality.
Best Practices
1. Update Context with Code
git commit -m "feat: Add Redis caching
Code:
- Added Redis client
- Implemented cache-aside pattern
Context:
- Updated .gptcode/context/shared.md with caching strategy
- Removed 'add caching' from .gptcode/context/next.md
"
Context is documentation. It evolves with code.
2. Review Context in PRs
## PR: Add Redis Caching
### Code Changes
- `lib/redis.ex`: Redis client
- `lib/cache.ex`: Cache implementation
### Context Changes
- `shared.md`: Added "Redis Caching" section
- `next.md`: Removed "Implement caching" task
### Reviewers
Please verify context is accurate ✓
3. Keep It Focused
Good:
## Stack
- Backend: Elixir/Phoenix
- Frontend: React + TypeScript
- DB: PostgreSQL
Bad:
## Stack
In 2019, we evaluated Ruby vs Elixir vs Node.js. After
considering various factors including performance, developer
experience, ecosystem maturity, hiring pool, and long-term
maintainability, we decided on Elixir because...
[3 more paragraphs]
Quick reference, not a novel.
Getting Started
Install
# GPTCode CLI includes context management
go install github.com/jadercorrea/gptcode/cmd/gptcode@latest
Initialize
cd ~/your-project
gptcode context init
Fill in Context
vi .gptcode/context/shared.md
vi .gptcode/context/next.md
Sync
gptcode context sync
Commit
git add .gptcode/ WARP.md
git commit -m "Add project context"
git push
That’s it. Your team now shares context.
FAQ
“Isn’t this just documentation?”
Yes, but version-controlled, AI-formatted, auto-synced documentation.
Traditional docs:
- ❌ Outdated (written once, forgotten)
- ❌ Not AI-friendly (pages of prose)
- ❌ Tool-specific (Notion, Confluence, Google Docs)
- ❌ Separate from code
Context Layer:
- ✅ Lives with code (
.gptcode/in your repo) - ✅ Version-controlled (git tracks changes)
- ✅ Concise & structured (AI-optimized format)
- ✅ Universal (works with ANY AI tool)
“Can’t I just use WARP.md?”
You can. But:
- ❌ Warp-only: Cursor, Claude, ChatGPT don’t read
WARP.md - ❌ No separation: Mix “what to do next” with “how things work”
- ❌ No tooling: Manual editing, no sync, no structure
Context Layer:
- ✅ Universal: One source → all tools
- ✅ Separated:
shared.md,next.md,roadmap.md - ✅ Tooling:
gptcode context sync, validation, etc.
Think of it as: WARP.md is the compilation target, .gptcode/context/ is the source code.
“My team doesn’t use AI assistants”
They will.
In 2023, “nobody used AI for coding.”
In 2024, Cursor raised $100M, Warp added AI agents.
In 2025, every IDE has AI built-in.
Setting up context now means:
- ✅ Team is ready when they adopt AI
- ✅ Onboarding gets easier (context is there)
- ✅ Better documentation (side benefit)
“What about private/sensitive information?”
Everything is local. No data sent to GPTCode servers.
Context lives in:
.gptcode/in your repo (you control it)- Synced to local files (
WARP.md,.cursor/docs/) - Exported to clipboard (you paste it)
For sensitive projects:
- Add
.gptcode/to.gitignore(keep context local-only) - Or commit public context, keep secrets in separate docs
The Bottom Line
Time is your most valuable asset.
Every minute spent re-explaining your architecture is a minute not spent building.
Universal Context Management gives you:
- 200 hours/year back (per developer)
- Consistent AI responses (team-wide)
- Instant onboarding (new devs/AI tools)
- Evolutionary documentation (changes with code)
All for running:
gptcode context init
Try It
# Install
go install github.com/jadercorrea/gptcode/cmd/gptcode@latest
# Initialize
cd ~/your-project
gptcode context init
# Fill in context
vi .gptcode/context/shared.md
# Sync
gptcode context sync
# Done
5 minutes to set up.
200 hours/year saved.
Not a bad ROI.
Read the full guide: Context Management Documentation
Questions? Open an issue on GitHub
Share your setup: Join the Discussion